U.S. Senate candidate Andy Martin prepares to host the Second Annual Conference on Barack Obama’s missing birth certificate, in New York December 18-19. Mainstream media continue to lie to the American people about Barack Obama’s “original” birth certificate.
Second National Conference on Barack Obama's Missing Birth Certificate
and College Records, December 18-19, New York City
Committee of One Million to
Defeat Barack Obama
www.committeeofonemillionto
defeatbarackobama.com
www.nationalconferenceon
obama.blogspot.com
Chicago mail:
Andy Martin, J. D.
Professor of Law (Adj.)
Executive Director
30 E. Huron Street, Suite 4406
Chicago, IL 60611-4723
Tel. (866) 706-2639
Fax (866) 707-2639
E-mail: AndyforUSSenator@aol.com
Sarah Palin joins the call for Obama to release his original Hawai’i birth certificate
Huffington Post, Politico, Ben Smith, Jed Lewison continue to lie to the American people
Sarah Palin and Andy Martin are not “birthers”
National conference set for New York City December 18-19
(NEW YORK)(December 4, 2009) Timing is everything. Earlier this week we formally announced the Second National Conference on Barack Obama’s Missing Birth Certificate and school records. As if on cue, former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin endorsed our view that Obama should release his original birth certificate: http://www.dailykos.com/tv/w/002387/
Predictably, the mainstream media have launched attacks on Palin, using their same old lies about Barack Obama.
Ben Smith and Jed Lewison of Huffington Post (and Politico.com?) falsely claim that “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.” That is a bald-faced lie:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
2009/12/03/palin-goes-birther-
obama_n_379634.html
FACT: Obama’s ORIGINAL Hawai’i birth certificate has never been seen by FactCheck.Org or anyone else except possibly Dr. Chiyome Fukino of the State of Hawai’i Health Department. What Smith, Lewison and FactCheck.org saw is a laser print-out of information contained in a computer database. Nothing more. Why do these “journalists” keep lying to the public and claiming a print-out is a “copy?” Why? Whose cause are they really serving with their lies?
FACT: Neither Sarah Palin nor I are “birthers.” “Birther" is a term that the bogus media have invented to disparage persons who make legitimate inquiries about Obama’s origins in Hawai'i.
I have conducted on the scene scholarly research about Obama’s roots in Hawai’i. Our new movie could be released as early as next week: “Obama: The Hawai’i Years.”
What I have asked Hawai’i officials to do is produce their original “ribbon” copy of Obama’s 1961 birth certificate. (For those of you not old enough to know what a “ribbon copy” is, ancient devices known as "typewriters" used “ribbons” to make impressions on paper. Cormac McCarthy’s original 1963 typewriter is about to be auctioned as an antique. The original copy of a document, i.e. the one which the typewriter ribbon actually touched, was known as the “ribbon copy.”)
Hawai’i officials have never released Obama’s ribbon copy of his birth certificate, despite many demands, lawsuits, etc. I am continuing my litigation for access. Because I am currently a candidate for U. S. Senator [www.AndyforUSSenator.com], I was unable to actively pursue the litigation in August-November, but we are gearing up to go back to Hawai’i to pry loose the original, 1961 document once funds are available.
FactCheck.org does not claim that the bogus “original” they saw is in fact the 1961 document, or that their “document” is a photocopy of the original typewritten 1961 piece of paper. On its face the document purports to be nothing more than a database printout. Is this print-out a “legal” document? Yes, it is. But it is not a copy of Obama’s original birth record.
What is the significance of the missing document? The laser-printed output contains significantly less birth information than the original typewritten 1961 certificate.
So where do Sarah Palin and I on the one hand, and “birthers” differ? I have never stated that Obama was born anywhere but Hawai’i; nor, to the best of my knowledge has Governor Palin. We just want to review the original 1961 Hawai'i document to see what information Obama has concealed. It is a perfectly reasonable request to examine the original document because, love him or hate him, Obama is a figure in American history and his original birth document is a historical archive.
“Birthers,” on the other hand, have proffered wild claims that Obama was born in Kenya, or elsewhere. I have looked into these accusations and found no evidence to support them. No one has ever produced any credible or legally admissible evidence to sustain these claims. Bogus media, however like to clump everyone who wants access to Obama’s Hawai’i records as a “birther,” so they can tar and feather us with the antics of kooks such as Orly Taitz, Phil Berg and similar bunkum artists.
There is absolutely no connection between demands that Obama authorize release of what he claims is his original 1961 document and the entirely separate “birther” movement.
QUESTION: If Obama has nothing to hide, why is he still hiding the 1961 original? All he has to do is call Fukino and say “release it.”
Finally, I am gratified that both in her bestselling book and in her comments this week, Governor Palin has endorsed my efforts in 2008 to lay the unpleasant truths about Barack Obama before the American people:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=
j8zj_Fj3QpY&annotation_id
=annotation_259119&feature=iv
After taking advantage of my expertise, Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch attacked me without any basis to do so, in a mendacious attempt to grovel before Obama & Co. Murdoch has never apologized for his malignant behavior. But I have been vindicated by history.
My Fox news comments clearly predicted where Obama would lead this nation, and my appearance on Hannity's America became the single-most controversial TV moment in the entire 2008 presidential campaign, precisely because I “connected the dots" about Obama for a national TV audience.
Due to a seasonal lull in politics, on December 17th I will be heading to New York to prepare for the National Conference on Obama December 18-19th. Please go to our blog to register:
www.nationalconferenceonobama.blogspot.com
Thank you Governor Palin for once again speaking truth to power.
------------------------------
Readers of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask,” say the book is still the only gold standard and practical handbook on Barack Obama's unfitness for the presidency. Buy it. Book orders: Amazon.com or http://OrangeStatePress.com. Immediate shipment from Amazon.com or signed copies (delayed for signing) from the publisher are available.
------------------------------
URGENT APPEAL: The Committee of One Million to Defeat Barack Obama raises money to oppose President Barack Obama's radical agenda and also to support www.BoycottHawaii.com.www.CommitteeofOneMilliontoDefeatBarackObama.com Please give generously.
Our ability to fight and defeat Barack Obama's political agenda is directly dependent on the generosity of every American. "The Committee of One Million to Defeat Barack Obama has no bundlers, no fat cats and no illegal contributions. Obama is opposed to almost everything America stands for," says Executive Director Andy Martin. "But while Obama has raised a billion dollar slush fund, his opponents lack sufficient resources. Americans can either contribute now, or pay later. If we do not succeed, Obama will."
-----------------------------------
Andy Martin is a legendary Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of broadcasting background in radio and television and is the dean of Illinois media and communications. He is currently promoting his best-selling book, Obama: The Man Behind The Mask and producing the new Internet movie "Obama: The Hawai'i years." Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of www.ContrarianCommentary.com. Andy holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York.
UPDATES: www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSAwww.facebook.com/AndyMartin Andy's columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. [NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in this story on our blogs; find our latest edition there.]
MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329 (cell not always on); E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com © Copyright by Andy Martin 2009.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
liar.
ReplyDeleteto "the anti-andy martin" I say this
ReplyDelete"YOU lie!!!"
Anyway, thank god Palin knows about this. She and McCain were practically ROBBED in 2008 and there MUST be justice for this illegal alien/ironic Democrat
I am appalled that the Obama machine has made it a toxic subject to question their spurious attempt to lay proof of Obama's birth certificate. To be labeled a birther is to be some tin foil hat wearing kook. I do not appreciate your calling the bravery of Phillip Berg and Orly Taiz to surge ahead in uncovering the truth and hopefully force Obama to truly prove his birth certification. I am suggesting that we begin to call FactCheck.org the "FatChance.ugh"
ReplyDeletecrowd for offering up such a lame excuse of "proof". As a birth certificate hospital clerk back in 1971 you actually have various birth certificates. 1) The hospital one with the name of the hospital on it with baby footprints on the back that the clerk types up. The ribbon copy as you call it that I would have had to type up; obtain the doctor's signatures, mother's signatures on etc. Then I told the mother that she would receive a short form certification of birth from the state office in a few weeks. Also the Register of Deeds entered in by hand all the information on the birth at the County Register of Deeds. Plus daily (not ten days later) the newspaper picked up a list of all babies born. Plus there are hospital records that show all births on all dates kept in log books. Years later I worked for DSS for the aged, blind, and disabled and because the mental capacity of a client might be impaired I would have to gather (3) proofs of birth. 1)If they had a baby birth photo I could find the name of the photography company the hospital used and obtain a copy of their negatives that were always time stamped with date. 2)The hospital copy 3)the hospital log in book 4)Search the County Register of Deeds books (open to the public)4)The certification copy from the State 5)....and if the only proof was that certificaiton of birth from the state I would request from the state office ..the ribbon copy..(long form)that the hospital clerk originally had the doctors & mother sign.
So why are Orly Taiz, Phillip Berg, you and any others checking any other forms of varification. Why is no one coming forth that said.."OMG I can't believe my child was born the same day in the same hospital as Obama"...especially with all these questions regarding his birth so much in debate. If I was born the same day in the same hospital as the President of the United States I would be letting someone know. Find one of those people...simple and easily googled to locate. When all this birth certificate questions began appearing and knowing all that I use to do for a living ..yeah! I am willing to be called a birther as long as anyone else has to jump thru hoops to verify their births and this is all the "pruf" these idiots have.